07/31/2010

Content on this page requires a newer version of Adobe Flash Player.

Get Adobe Flash player


The Retske Report: Prepaid Convergence
Regulatory Rundown
5 Minutes With David Stone
Prepaid Converges in Las Vegas
Retske Report: Beyond Profit
5 Minutes With Mamoon Rashid
Regulatory Rundown
October 18th, 2004
LEGAL LINE

By Ed Maldonado, Esq.
Dear Legal Line,

I have begun selling prepaid cards under a deal with a service provider who supplies me with branded cards. What approvals, registrations and licenses do I need? Do I have to do this for each and every state I sell cards in or does the 214 really cover it all?

-- Branding Brandon


Dear BB,


What do you mean by “branded cards” in your question? The term “branded” is used very loosely in the industry and has different implications based upon who may be using it and how your services actually operate. Can you spell out the logistics of the way you and the service provider are working? I can’t tell if you are simply a distributor of their services or, if in fact, whether you may be a prepaid calling provider based upon what you do. Also, are there any contractual restrictions with the provider as to where you can sell the cards?

-- Legal Line


Dear Legal Line,


The way my provider and I work is like this: they provide the network services and all long distance services for me at a discounted price. They also handle the access numbers, and customer service end, and PINs to access the services. I can charge whatever I want above the provider’s rate (fees and surcharges) to particular destinations or for use of the cards. The PINs are automatically set with that rate and user charges. I then print the cards with graphic, the access numbers, and PINs and then distribute the cards anywhere I want in the US. My cards are printed with network service provided by “the service provider’s name” along with their customer service number. That is about it.

-- Branding Brandon

Dear BB,


From the current arrangement you have with your provider, it appears that your regulatory liability is relatively limited at the moment. It appears that your service provider is undertaking the responsibility of being the disclosed prepaid provider on the cards for state and federal regulatory purposes. This is by virtue of them allowing you to print the disclosure that they are the carrier, or “network service provider,” on the cards and thereafter allowing you to sell freely throughout the US. They, therefore, operate openly as the carrier of the LD services throughout the US for your branded cards. This point is also strengthened by the fact that they maintain a customer service department to support their carrier services on the cards.
In this type of branded prepaid calling card arrangement, it is generally incumbent upon your provider to have all applicable licensure and registrations to provide prepaid calling services to the public in whatever jurisdiction the cards are sold. There are ten critical states related to this – AL, AK, CA, CT, FL, IL, LA, MO, NY, TX, and WA (state). These states have specific provisions for prepaid calling cards and consumer disclosures of the provider who controls the rates and charges. What seems problematic in your situation are two points: (1) you actually set the final rates, fees, and surcharges that the consumer must pay; and (2) should you have a falling out with your service provider you are not in a position, from a regulatory perspective, to replace them as a carrier and still continue on with your cards.

First, let’s address your “rate control” issue first because it is more of a state regulatory issue related to consumer protection. Let us say, purely for the sake of argument, that for some reason your current service provider is actually not licensed or certified to provide prepaid LD services in a particular state, even though they say they are. By virtue of your activity in setting the final rates and fees charged and controlling this process, as well as selling cards into that state, you may just be the responsible party for regulatory purposes as far as state Public Utility Commissions are concerned. That is because you “in fact” control the card. Many state regulatory definitions of prepaid providers look to the actual activity of the provider to determine whether or not regulation should apply. The newly enacted Illinois law is a prime example of this regime. This may be a critical factor in the event your branded cards are investigated or audited by state regulators as to rates and fees charged to the consumer. It may become apparent that you are the one exercising final control over the cards and that you have not been qualified or certified to do so in their jurisdiction. Here is where there would be liability on your part. This could mean anything from being shut down to being fined dependent upon the state.

Another possible scenario along these lines could be a little more mundane, let’s say that state regulators have a complaint from a consumer and are investigating the rate or charges of your “branded” card. They will first inquire to your service provider who is listed on the card. Let’s say that your service provider has no idea why you charged that rate, or surcharge, and discloses that you are the one actually in control of the card in order to avoid the regulatory consequences. You are now in the frontline of their investigation, unlicensed and uncertified, selling cards in their jurisdiction. Again, this would be a point where there would be liability on your part. In order to void such uncomfortable, and costly, situations is to acquire state certification as a back up. It is a preventive move that can save you in the long run. This is particularly true for those ten critical states where prepaid calling is specifically addressed.

It is also important to verify that your provider is actually licensed nationally, since they are obviously giving a regulatory “face” to the network services disclosed on your cards. Simply having 214 Authority is not enough in this instance. Federal regulation is relatively broad and supplemented primarily by the state consumer protection and public necessity laws. Complying with these laws is why there is state certification in the first place. It is therefore critical that your service provider has state certification in each and every state in which you sell to defend against consumer complaints as to services on the cards.

To obtain state certification, is relatively simple — a provider must register to do business in each state under a Certificate of Authority (C of A) and be granted authority to provide such services by that state’s Public Utility Commission. However, if your provider is missing state certifications, or certification of a particular state, and you are selling into that jurisdiction, scenarios like the above can occur leaving you on the hook. My opinion is that these are scenarios best to be avoided.

Now let’s talk about consequences that could arise out of you having a falling out with your service provider. This scenario is relatively simple — a dispute arises between you and the service provider over a billing or service issue and the service provider terminates your agreement. In these instances, the branded card “owner” is usually in the losing position because the service provider simply turns-off services to cards or PINs. Since the service provider controls the provisioning side of the service (access numbers, PINs and facilities), replacement of the service provider by the “branded card” owner with another carrier for your cards on the street is almost impossible. The problem stems from the fact that the “branded card” owner was never really in a place to change carriers from day one. They were always dependent on the service provider.

Having your own state certifications and 214 Authority can change that dependency. It allows the branded card owner to qualify himself to own his own Access Numbers or allow for the transfer of PINs to recover cards. It also allows the branded card owner to do this seamlessly by having their name as the carrier or service provider on the card itself. While state certification and 214 Authority do have regulatory reporting, tax and fee requirements, the ability to solidly shield yourself from consumer protection inquiries and the ability to recover if you switch carriers may be the trade-offs to consider.

Under the current arrangement with your service provider it appears that they are the ones bearing the regulatory responsibility of the carrier services of your “branded cards.” This alleviates the need for you to be licensed for such purposes. However, you need to verify that they are indeed licensed and certified to provide those services – just for the sake of protecting yourself. My recommendation is to ask them for copies of their certificates or certificate/registration numbers from the PUCs of the states that you sell your cards into. Also you should consider certifying yourself in the near future for purposes of shielding yourself from consumer protection inquires by state regulators and giving yourself room to recover in the event that you and your current service provider have a falling out. Should you wish to explore these points further, definitely seek the opinion of a regulatory attorney with whom you can give more detail as to the logistics of your “branded” card services. Believe it or not, the devil is in the detail when it comes to these matters. There are many service providers out there that offer “branded” cards in a completely different way that requires you to license and certify yourself in all the states in which you sell. This is often a cleaner method for the “branded” card owner. The bottom line is it just depends on the logistics of your arrangement with the service provider.

Good Luck & Success in the Industry!


•• Ed Maldonado is a Partner of Maldonado & Glenn. He can be reached at emaldonado@4counsel.net.



Share/Save/Bookmark
 
Search in:
Keywords:
 
See Previous Editions:
Copyright ©2002-2006 The Prepaid Press. All rights reserved